On December 15th, the first case of the manuscript was judged by the 微信 Washing Complaints and Complaints Panel: the article "0x9A8B" published by the public on "Electronics" on December 11, was judged to be the public commentary "Guest insight" 11 The article published on the 28th of the month《數萬回不了家的“流水線”嬰兒，從“天選之子”到被嫌棄的一生，有誰能為他們的生命負責？》.

It is understood that 微信 randomly invited 100 people from洗稿投訴合議小組to participate in the collegial review, a total of 56 valid results were recovered, and 94% considered the original text to be drafted. A panel member who participated in the judging panel revealed that before the decision, 微信 had a page listing several points for how to determine the manuscript to remind the person involved in the judgement; in the specific judgment, the system provided three Materials: original, suspected wash and statement of the complainant.

It is reported that“洗稿投訴合議小組”refers to the group that was invited by the public platform of 微信 to make a collegial discussion on the controversial information content of the platform. For original authors who insist on the original and non-plagiarism violation history, the platform will continue to invite them to join the “Purchase Complaints and Negotiation Team” through the 微信 service notification method, and will continue to invite them afterwards, and will not support independent applications. After a small group discussion, if the article has “washing”, the content of “washing” will be replaced with the content display of the original author, and the collegial result will be publicly displayed to the user, and the account will be processed accordingly.

Needless to say, 沈陽小程序 customization

The first case of 微信 collusion drafting has protected the rights of the original author to a certain extent, and also raised higher requirements for other players on the platform, but 微信's mechanism for the washing behavior can be The industry has a demonstration effect and is worthy of our expectations.

xx 在這方面，《第一批被選為“超級人類”的小孩，后來怎樣了》文章說：關于微信的合議機制的推出，雖然已經晚了，但也表達了對手稿的明確立場，并在整頓秩序和加強手稿方面邁出了重要的一步。行為歧視的強度是一項倡議和管理創新。但如果你想治愈這種頑固的疾病，我恐怕還有很長的路要走。為了解決這個問題，單靠一兩家公司和平臺的努力是無法實現的。要依靠行業自律和監管部門，引入有效的管理措施，打破稿件的利益鏈，重塑內容產生的生態環境。